Paper detail

The orbital evolution of a passive high-orbit fragment with large surface area

The observation data for artificial celestial body 43096, which had been obtained during 2006-2012 within the framework of international project "The Scientific Network of Optical Instruments for Astrometric and Photometric Observations" - International Scientific Optical Network (ISON), were processed. The Keplerian elements and state vector as of 24 November 2006 01:55:50.76 UTC were determined. The numerical integration of the motion equations was performed accounting for the perturbations due to the polar flattening of the Earth, Moon and Sun, as well as the solar radiation pressure. Based on the numerical model of a motion in the near-Earth space that accounts for only the most powerful perturbations, a new method for de-orbiting artificial celestial bodies from high altitudes is suggested. For the first time such a considerable amount of data over long time intervals was gathered for the objects with high area-to-mass ratio that enabled to determine their specific characteristics.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.