Paper detail

The optimal weighting function for cosmic magnification measurement through foreground galaxy-background galaxy (quasar) cross correlation

Cosmic magnification has been detected through cross correlation between foreground and background populations (galaxies or quasars). It has been shown that weighing each background object by its $α-1$ can significantly improve the cosmic magnification measurement \citep{Menard02,Scranton05}. Here, $α$ is the logarithmic slope of the luminosity function of background populations. However, we find that this weighting function is optimal only for sparse background populations in which intrinsic clustering is negligible with respect to shot noise. We derive the optimal weighting function for general case including scale independent and scale dependent weights. The optimal weighting function improves the S/N (signal to noise ratio) by $\sim 20%$ for a BigBOSS-like survey and the improvement can reach a factor of $\sim 2$ for surveys with much denser background populations.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.