Paper detail

The optimal redshift for detecting ionized bubbles in HI 21-cm maps

The detection of individual ionized bubbles in HI 21-cm maps is one of the most promising, direct probes of the epoch of reionization(EoR). Atleast 1000 hrs of observation would be required for such a detection with either the currently functioning GMRT or the upcoming MWA. Considering the large investment of telescope time it is essential to identify the``optimal redshift'' where the prospects of a detection are most favourable. We find that the optimal redshift is determined by a combination of instrument dependent factors and the evolution of the neutral fraction x_HI. We find that the redshift range 8.1 +/- 1.1 and 9.8 +/- 1 are optimum for detecting ionized bubbles with the GMRT and MWA respectively. The prospects of a detection, we find, are more favourable in a scenario with late reionization with x_HI \approx 0.5 at z \approx 7.5 as compared to an early reionization model where x_HI \approx 0.5 at z \approx 10. In the late reionization scenario, for both instruments a 3 σdetection is possible for bubbles of comoving radius R_b>= 30 Mpc with 1000 hrs of observation. Future observations will either lead to the detection of ionized bubbles, or in the event of non-detection, lead to constraints on the product x_HI R_b^γfor the observational volume, where γ=1.5 and 2 for GMRT and MWA respectively.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.