Paper detail

The optical luminosity function of LOFAR radio-selected quasars at $1.4\leq z\leq5.0$ in the NDWFS-Boötes field

We present an estimate of the optical luminosity function (OLF) of LOFAR radio-selected quasars (RSQs) at $1.4<z<5.0$ in the $9.3\:\textrm{deg}^{2}$ NOAO Deep Wide-field survey (NDWFS) of the Boötes field. The selection was based on optical/mid-ir photometry used to train three different machine learning (ML) algorithms. Objects taken as quasars by the ML algorithms are required to be detected at $5σ$ significance in deep radio maps to be classified as candidate quasars. The optical imaging came from the SDSS and the PS1 $3π$ survey; mid-ir photometry was taken from the SDWFS survey; and radio data was obtained from deep LOFAR imaging of the NDWFS-Boötes field. The requirement of a $5σ$ LOFAR detection allowed us to reduce the stellar contamination in our sample by two orders of magnitude. The sample comprises 134 objects, including both photometrically selected candidate quasars (47) and spectroscopically confirmed quasars (83). The depth of our LOFAR observations allowed us to detect the radio-emission of quasars that would be otherwise classified as radio-quiet. Around $65\%$ of the quasars in the sample are fainter than $M_{\textrm{1450}}=-24.0$, a regime where the OLF of quasars selected through their radio emission, has not been investigated in detail. It has been demonstrated that in cases where mid-ir wedge-based AGN selection is not possible due to a lack of appropriate data, the selection of quasars using ML algorithms trained with optical/mid-ir photometry in combination with LOFAR data provides an excellent approach for obtaining samples of quasars. We demonstrate that RSQs show an evolution similar to that exhibited by faint quasars $(M_{\textrm{1450}}\leq-22.0)$. Finally, we find that RSQs may compose up to $\sim20\%$ of the whole faint quasar population (radio-detected plus radio-undetected).

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.