Paper detail

The Optical Identification of a Primeval Galaxy at z >~ 4.4

We have obtained with the SUSI CCD camera on the ESO 3.5m NTT deep images in the BVRI bands of the field centered on the QSO BRI 1202-0725 ($z_{\it em}=4.694$). In the final combined frames the stellar images have FWHM of 1,1,0.6 and 0.65 arcsec respectively. The R and I images show clearly a galaxy $2.2''$ from the QSO, corresponding to $13h^{-1}_{50}$ kpc at $z\sim 4.5$. Possible identification with the metal absorption systems seen in the line of sight to the QSO, including the highest redshift damped system known to date at $z=4.383$, are discussed. We conclude that its colours can be reconciled only with the spectrum of a primeval galaxy at z >~ 4.4, making it the most distant galaxy detected so far. From its magnitudes and models of young galaxy evolution we deduce that it is forming stars at a rate $\sim 30 M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$ and has an estimated age of the order of $10^8$ yr or less, implying that the bulk of the stellar population formed at $z < 6$.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.