Paper detail

The Optical Depth of Foregrounds for the Highest Redshift 21 cm Signals

Foreground emission makes it difficult to detect the highly-redshifted cosmological 21 cm signal at any frequency. However, at low frequencies foregrounds are likely to become optically thick, which would make it completely impossible to see a 21 cm signal behind them. To find out which regions of the sky might be optically thick for the highest redshifts of the 21 cm signal, we fit the measurements from LWA1 and the Haslam 408 MHz map with a two-component spectral model and calculate the frequency-dependent foreground optical depth point-by-point across the sky. Limitations of the current data prevent us from making any strong conclusions at high statistical significance, but there is suggestive evidence ($\sim1σ$) that as much as 25% of the sky could be obscured for the highest redshift 21 cm signals.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.