Paper detail

The Open Cluster NGC 2437 (Messier 46)

The stellar content of the open cluster NGC 2437 (Messier 46) is investigated using moderately deep u*,g&#39;, and r&#39; MegaCam images. When compared with solar metallicity isochrones, the (g&#39;, u&#39;-g&#39;) and (r&#39;, g&#39;-r&#39;) CMDs are consistent with an age log(t_yr) = 8.35 +/- 0.15, a distance modulus 11.05 +/- 0.05, and a color excess E(B-V) = 0.115 +/- 0.035. The r&#39; luminosity function (LF) of main sequence stars in the magnitude range r&#39; < 17 (i.e. masses > 0.8 solar) has a shape that follows solar neighborhood star counts. However, at fainter magnitudes the cluster LF is flat, in contrast with what would be expected from solar neighborhood counts. The clustering properties of stars in NGC 2437 are investigated by examining the two-point angular correlation functions of main sequence stars in different brightness ranges. Main sequence stars fainter than r&#39; = 17 are less centrally concentrated than brighter stars and are found over a larger area of the sky, suggesting that there is a corona of faint main sequence stars around NGC 2437. Based on the flat LF and extended spatial distribution of faint stars, it is concluded that NGC 2437 is actively shedding stars with masses < 0.8 solar.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.