Paper detail

The [OIII]$\lambda5007$ equivalent width distribution at z $\sim2$: The redshift evolution of the extreme emission line galaxies

We determine the [OIII]$\lambda5007$ equivalent width (EW) distribution of $1.700<\rm{z}<2.274$ rest-frame UV-selected (M$_{\rm{UV}}<-19$) star-forming galaxies in the GOODS North and South fields. We make use of deep HDUV broadband photometry catalogues for selection and 3D-HST WFC3/IR grism spectra for measurement of line properties. The [OIII]$\lambda5007$ EW distribution allows us to measure the abundance of extreme emission line galaxies (EELGs) within this population. We model a log-normal distribution to the [OIII]$\lambda5007$ rest-frame equivalent widths of galaxies in our sample, with location parameter $μ=4.24\pm0.07$ and variance parameter $σ= 1.33\pm0.06$. This EW distribution has a mean [OIII]$\lambda5007$ EW of 168$\pm1Å$. The fractions of $\rm{z}\sim2$ rest-UV-selected galaxies with [OIII]$\lambda5007$ EWs greater than $500, 750$ and $1000Å$ are measured to be $6.8^{+1.0}_{-0.9}\%$, $3.6^{+0.7}_{-0.6}\%$, and $2.2^{+0.5}_{-0.4}\%$ respectively. The EELG fractions do not vary strongly with UV luminosity in the range ($-21.6<M_{\rm{UV}}<-19.0$) considered in this paper, consistent with findings at higher redshifts. We compare our results to $\rm{z}\sim5$ and $\rm{z}\sim7$ studies where candidate EELGs have been discovered through Spitzer/IRAC colours, and we identify rapid evolution with redshift in the fraction of star-forming galaxies observed in an extreme emission line phase (a rise by a factor $\sim10$ between $\rm{z}\sim2$ and $\rm{z}\sim7$). This evolution is consistent with an increased incidence of strong bursts in the galaxy population of the reionisation era. While this population makes a sub-dominant contribution of the ionising emissivity at $\rm{z}\simeq2$, EELGs are likely to dominate the ionising output in the reionisation era.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.