Paper detail

The Odd Meanderings of the IMF Across Cosmic Time

It is difficult to reconcile the observed evolution of the star formation rate versus stellar mass (SFR-M*) relation with expectations from current hierarchical galaxy formation models. The observed SFR-M* relation shows a rapid rise in SFR(M*) from z=0-2, and then a surprisingly lack of amplitude evolution out to z~6+. Hierarchical models of galaxy formation match this trend qualitatively but not quantitatively, with a maximum discrepancy of ~x3 in SFR at z~2. One explanation, albeit radical, is that the IMF becomes modestly weighted towards massive stars out to z~2, and then evolves back towards its present-day form by z~4 or so. We observe that this redshift trend mimics that of the cosmic fraction of obscured star formation, perhaps hinting at a physical connection. Such IMF evolution would concurrently go towards explaining persistent discrepancies between integrated measures of star formation and present-day stellar mass or cosmic colors.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.