Paper detail

The odd-isotope fractions of Barium in CEMP-r/s star HE 0338-3945 and r-II star CS 31082-001

We report the first measurement of the odd-isotope fractions for barium, \fodd\, in two extremely metal-poor stars: a CEMP-r/s star \he\ (\feh\,$=-2.42\pm0.11$) and an r-II star \cs\ (\feh\,$=-2.90\pm0.13$). The measured \fodd\ values are $0.23\pm0.12$ corresponding to $34.3\pm34.3$\% of the r-process contributions for \he\ and $0.43\pm0.09$ corresponding to $91.4\pm25.7$\% of the r-process contribution to Ba production for \cs. The high r-process signature of barium in \cs\ ($91.4\pm25.7\%$) suggests that the majority of the heavy elements in this star were synthesised via an r-process path, while the lower r-process value ($34.3\pm34.3\%$) found in \he\ indicates that the heavy elements in this star formed through a mix of s-process and r-process synthesis. These conclusions are consistent with studies based on AGB model calculations to fit their abundance distributions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.