Paper detail

The Observed Growth of Massive Galaxy Clusters IV: Robust Constraints on Neutrino Properties

This is the fourth of a series of papers in which we derive simultaneous constraints on cosmological parameters and X-ray scaling relations using observations of the growth of massive, X-ray flux-selected galaxy clusters. Here we examine the constraints on neutrino properties that are enabled by the precise and robust constraint on the amplitude of the matter power spectrum at low redshift that is available from our data. In combination with cluster gas-mass fraction, cosmic microwave background, supernova and baryon acoustic oscillation data, and incorporating conservative allowances for systematic uncertainties, we limit the species-summed neutrino mass, M_nu, to <0.33 eV at 95.4 per cent confidence in a spatially flat, cosmological constant (LambdaCDM) model. In a flat LambdaCDM model where the effective number of neutrino species, N_eff, is allowed to vary, we find N_eff = 3.4 -0.5 +0.6 (68.3 per cent confidence, incorporating a direct constraint on the Hubble parameter from Cepheid and supernova data). We also obtain results with additional degrees of freedom in the cosmological model, in the form of global spatial curvature (Omega_k) and a primordial spectrum of tensor perturbations (r and n_t). The results are not immune to these generalizations; however, in the most general case we consider, in which M_nu, N_eff, curvature and tensors are all free, we still obtain M_nu < 0.70 eV and N_eff = 3.7 +- 0.7 (at respectively the same confidence levels as above). These results agree well with recent work using independent data, and highlight the importance of measuring cosmic structure and expansion at low as well as high redshifts. Although our cluster data extend to redshift z=0.5, the effect of neutrino mass on the growth of structure at late times is not yet detected at a significant level.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.