Paper detail

The observational signatures of high-redshift dark stars

The annihilation of dark matter particles in the centers of minihalos may lead to the formation of so-called dark stars, which are cooler, larger, more massive and potentially more long-lived than conventional population III stars. Here, we investigate the prospects of detecting high-redshift dark stars with both existing and upcoming telescopes. We find that individual dark stars with masses below ~1e3 Msolar are intrinsically too faint even for the upcoming James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). However, by exploiting foreground galaxy clusters as gravitational telescopes, certain varieties of such dark stars should be within reach of the JWST at z=10. If more massive dark stars are able to form, they may be detectable by JWST even in the absence of lensing. In fact, some of the supermassive (~1e7 Msolar) dark stars recently proposed are sufficiently bright at z=10 to be detectable even with existing facilities, like the Hubble Space Telescope and 8-10 m telescopes on the ground. Finally, we argue that since the hottest dark stars (Teff > 30000 K) can produce their own HII regions, they may be substantially brighter than what estimates based on stellar atmosphere spectra would suggest.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.