Paper detail

The number of rational points on a family of varieties over finite fields

Let $\mathbb{F}_q$ stand for the finite field of odd characteristic $p$ with $q$ elements ($q=p^{n},n\in \mathbb{N} $) and $\mathbb{F}_q^*$ denote the set of all the nonzero elements of $\mathbb{F}_{q}$. Let $m$ and $t$ be positive integers. In this paper, by using the Smith normal form of the exponent matrix, we obtain a formula for the number of rational points on the variety defined by the following system of equations over $\mathbb{F}_{q}$: $$ \sum\limits_{j=0}^{t-1}\sum\limits_{i=1}^{r_{j+1}-r_j} a_{k,r_j+i}x_1^{e^{(k)}_{r_j+i,1}}...x_{n_{j+1}}^{e^{(k)}_{r_j+i,n_{j+1}}}=b_k, \ k=1,...,m. $$ where the integers $t>0$, $r_0=0<r_1<r_2<...<r_t$, $1\le n_1<n_2<...<n_t$, $0\leq j\leq t-1$, $b_k\in \mathbb{F}_{q}$, $a_{k,i}\in \mathbb{F}_{q}^{*}$, $(k=1,...,m, i=1,...,r_t)$, and the exponent of each variable is a positive integer. Furthermore, under some natural conditions, we arrive at an explicit formula for the number of the above variety. It extends the results obtained previously by Wolfmann, Sun, Wang, Song, Chen, Hong, Hu and Zhao et al. Our result also answers completely an open problem raised by Song and Chen.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.