Paper detail

The number density of superdense early-type galaxies at 1<z<2 and the local cluster galaxies

Many of the early-type galaxies observed so far at z>1 turned out to have smaller radii with respect to that of a typical present-day early-type galaxy with comparable mass. This has generated the conviction that in the past early-type galaxies were more compact, hence denser, and that as a consequence, they should have increased their radius across the time to reconcile with the present-day ones. However, observations have not yet established whether the population of early-types in the early Universe was fully represented by compact galaxies nor if they were so much more numerous than in the present-day Universe to require an evolution of their sizes. Here we report the results of a study based on a complete sample of 34 early-type galaxies at 0.9<z_{spec}<1.92. We find a majority (62 per cent) of normal early-type galaxies similar to typical local ones, co-existing with compact early-types from ~2 to ~6 times smaller in spite of the same mass and redshift. The co-existence of normal and compact early-type galaxies at <z>~1.5 suggests that their build-up taken place in the first 3-4 Gyr, followed distinct paths. Also, we find that the number density of compact early-types at <z>~1.5 is consistent with the lower limits of the local number density of compact early-types derived from local clusters of galaxies. The similar number of compact early-types found in the early and in the present day Universe frustrates the hypothesized effective radius evolution while provides evidence that also compact ETGs were as we see them today 9-10 Gyr ago. Finally, the fact that (at least) most of the compact ETGs at high-z are accounted for by compact early-types in local cluster of galaxies implies that the former are the direct progenitors of the compact early-type cluster galaxies establishing a direct link between environment and early phases of assembly of ETGs.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.