Paper detail

The Number Densities and Stellar Populations of Massive Galaxies at 3 < z < 6: A Diverse, Rapidly Forming Population in the Early Universe

We present the census of massive (log(M$_{*}$/M$_{\odot}$)$\geq 11$) galaxies at $3<z<6$ identified over the COSMOS/UltraVISTA Ultra-Deep field stripes: consisting of $\approx100$ and $\approx20$ high-confidence candidates at $3<z<4$ and $4<z<6$, respectively. The $3<z<4$ population is comprised of post-starburst, UV star-forming and dusty-star forming galaxies in roughly equal fractions, while UV-star-forming galaxies dominate at $4<z<6$ . We account for various sources of biases in SED modelling, finding that the treatment of emission line contamination is essential for understanding the number densities and mass growth histories of massive galaxies at $z>3$. The significant increase in observed number densities at $z\sim4$ ($>\times$ 5 in $\lesssim600$ Myrs) implies that this is the epoch at which log(M$_{*}$/M$_{\odot}$)$\geq 11$ galaxies emerge in significant numbers, with stellar ages ($\approx500-900$ Myrs) indicating rapid formation epochs as early as $z\sim7$. Leveraging ancillary multi-wavelength datasets, we perform panchromatic SED modelling to constrain the total star-formation activity of the sample. The star-formation activity of the sample is generally consistent with being on the star-formation main sequence at the considered redshifts, with $\approx15-25\%$ of the population showing evidence of suppressed star-formation rates, indicating that quenching mechanisms are already at play by $z\sim4$. We stack available HST imaging, confirming their compact nature ($r_{e}\lesssim2.2$ kpc), consistent with expected sizes of high-$z$ star-forming galaxies. Finally, we discuss how our results are in-line with the early formation epochs and short formation timescales inferred from the fossil records of the most massive galaxies in the Universe.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.