Paper detail

The Novel Obscured State of Stellar-mass Black Hole GRS 1915+105

GRS 1915$+$105 is a stellar-mass black hole that is well known for exhibiting at least 12 distinct classes of X-ray variability and correlated multi-wavelength behavior. Despite such extraordinary variability, GRS 1915$+$105 remained one of the brightest sources in the X-ray sky. However, in early 2019, the source became much fainter, apparently entering a new accretion state. Here, we report the results of an extensive, year-long monitoring campaign of GRS 1915$+$105 with the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory. During this interval, the flux of GRS 1915$+$105 gradually diminished; the observed count rate eventually dropped by two orders of magnitude. Simple but robust spectral fits to these monitoring observations show that this new state results from the combination of a dramatic and persistent increase in internal obscuration, and a reduced mass accretion rate. The internal obscuration is the dominant effect, with a median value of $N_{H} = 7\times 10^{23}~{\rm cm}^{-2}$. In a number of observations, the source appears to be Compton-thick. We suggest that this state should be identified as the "obscured state," and discuss the implications of this new (or rarely observed) accretion mode for black holes across the mass scale.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.