Paper detail

The nonlinear stability of n+1 dimensional FLRW spacetimes

We prove nonlinear Lyapunov stability of a family of `$n+1$'-dimensional cosmological models of general relativity locally isometric to the Friedman Lemaître Robertson Walker (FLRW) spacetimes including a positive cosmological constant. In particular, we show that the perturbed solutions to the Einstein-Euler field equations around a class of spatially compact FLRW metrics (for which the spatial slices are compact negative Einstein spaces in general and hyperbolic for the physically relevant $n=3$ case) arising from regular Cauchy data remain uniformly bounded and decay to a family of metrics with constant negative spatial scalar curvature. To accomplish this result, we employ an energy method for the coupled Einstein-Euler field equations in constant mean extrinsic curvature spatial harmonic gauge (CMCSH). In order to handle Euler's equations, we construct energy from a current that is similar to the one derived by Christodoulou \cite{christodoulou} (and which coincides with Christodoulou's current on the Minkowski space) and show that this energy controls the desired norm of the fluid degrees of freedom. The use of a fluid energy current together with the CMCSH gauge condition casts the Einstein-Euler field equations into a coupled elliptic-hyperbolic system. Utilizing the estimates derived from the elliptic equations, we first show that the gravity-fluid energy functional remains uniformly bounded in the expanding direction. Using this uniform boundedness property, we later obtain sharp decay estimates if a positive cosmological constant $Λ$ is included, which suggests that the accelerated expansion of the physical universe that is induced by the positive cosmological constant is sufficient to control the non-linearities in the case of small data. A few physical consequences of this stability result are discussed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.