Paper detail

The nonisothermal stage of magnetic star formation. II. Results

In a previous paper we formulated the problem of the formation and evolution of fragments (or cores) in magnetically-supported, self-gravitating molecular clouds in axisymmetric geometry, accounting for the effects of ambipolar diffusion and Ohmic dissipation, grain chemistry and dynamics, and radiative transfer. Here we present results of star formation simulations that accurately track the evolution of a protostellar fragment over eleven orders of magnitude in density (from 300 cm^-3 to \approx 10^14 cm^-3), i.e., from the early ambipolar-diffusion--initiated fragmentation phase, through the magnetically supercritical, dynamical-contraction phase and the subsequent magnetic decoupling stage, to the formation of a protostellar core in near hydrostatic equilibrium. As found by Fiedler & Mouschovias (1993), gravitationally-driven ambipolar diffusion leads to the formation and subsequent dynamic contraction of a magnetically supercritical core. Moreover, we find that ambipolar diffusion, not Ohmic dissipation, is responsible for decoupling all the species except the electrons from the magnetic field, by a density \approx 3 x 10^12 cm^-3. Magnetic decoupling precedes the formation of a central stellar object and ultimately gives rise to a concentration of magnetic flux (a `magnetic wall') outside the hydrostatic core --- as also found by Tassis & Mouschovias (2005a,b) through a different approach. At approximately the same density at which Ohmic dissipation becomes more important than ambipolar diffusion (\gtrsim 7 x 10^12 cm^-3), the grains carry most of the electric charge as well as the electric current. The prestellar core remains disclike down to radii ~ 10 AU, inside which thermal pressure becomes important. The magnetic flux problem of star formation is resolved for at least strongly magnetic newborn stars by this stage of the evolution, i.e., by a central density \approx 10^14 cm^-3. The hydrostatic core has radius \approx 2 AU, density \approx 10^14 cm^-3, temperature \approx 300 K, magnetic field strength \approx 0.2 G, magnetic flux \approx 5 x 10^18 Wb, luminosity ~ 10^-3 L_\odot, and mass ~ 10^-2 M_\odot.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.