Paper detail

The Non-Monotonic Dependence of Supernova and Remnant Formation on Progenitor Rotation

Traditional models of core collapse suggest the issue of successful versus failed supernova explosions and neutron star versus black hole formation depends monotonically on the mass (and metallicity) of the progenitor star. Here we argue that the issue of success or failure of the explosion or other possible outcomes may depend non--monotonically on the rotation of the progenitor star even at fixed progenitor mass and composition. We have computed "shellular" models of core collapse for a star of 15 M_solar with initial central angular velocity, Omega_0, in the range 0.1 -- 8 rad/s until a few hundred ms after bounce to explore qualitative trends. The non--monotonic behavior will be manifested in the rotation of the proto--neutron star and hence in the strength of the associated magnetic field that will be generated by shear in that rotating environment. We estimate that our maximally rotating and shearing models generate toroidal fields approaching or exceeding 10^17G, strengths nearing dynamical significance.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.