Paper detail

The Non-integrable Mass and the Scalar Charge

The non-integrable mass is studied explicitly in this paper. We study Einstein-scalar gravities with weakened boundary conditions, and calculate the mass with the Hamiltonian formula and Wald's formula respectively. We find the masses calculated by these two formulas are non-integrable. One way to solve this non-integrability problem is to impose boundary conditions; however, we find the mass calculated in this way has many other problems. This implies the macroscopic thermodynamic properties of the scalar hairy black holes should be described by one more charge beside the mass, which we call a scalar charge. In fact, the non-integrability of mass will always arise when the matter fields have charges which is not associate to any diffeomorphisms of spacetime. We find the mass becomes non-integrable just because Wald's formula is used in a wrong way. Based on Wald's formula and the existence of the scalar charge, we propose a new definition for mass, with the modification that we require the variation of the Hamiltonian to have no contribution from the variation of the other charges. This new definition is also valid for much more general gravities coupled to matter fields with other charges.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.