Paper detail

The NIRSPEC Ultracool Dwarf Radial Velocity Survey

We report the results of an infrared Doppler survey designed to detect brown dwarf and giant planetary companions to a magnitude-limited sample of ultracool dwarfs. Using the NIRSPEC spectrograph on the Keck II telescope, we obtained approximately 600 radial velocity measurements over a period of six years for a sample of 59 late-M and L dwarfs spanning spectral types M8/L0 to L6. A subsample of 46 of our targets have been observed on three or more epochs. We rely on telluric CH4 absorption features in the Earth&#39;s atmosphere as a simultaneous wavelength reference and exploit the rich set of CO absorption features found in the K-band spectra of cool stars and brown dwarfs to measure radial velocities and projected rotational velocities. For a bright, slowly rotating M dwarf standard we demonstrate a radial velocity precision of 50 m/s, and for slowly rotating L dwarfs we achieve a typical radial velocity precision of approximately 200 m/s. This precision is sufficient for the detection of close-in giant planetary companions to mid-L dwarfs as well as more equal mass spectroscopic binary systems with small separations (a<2 AU). We present an orbital solution for the subdwarf binary LSR1610-0040 as well as an improved solution for the M/T binary 2M0320-04. We also combine our radial velocity measurements with distance estimates and proper motions from the literature to estimate the dispersion of the space velocities of the objects in our sample. Using a kinematic age estimate we conclude that our UCDs have an age of 5.0+0.7-0.6 Gyr, similar to that of nearby sun-like stars. We simulate the efficiency with which we detect spectroscopic binaries and find that the rate of tight (a<1 AU) binaries in our sample is 2.5+8.6-1.6%, consistent with recent estimates in the literature of a tight binary fraction of 3-4%. (abridged)

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.