Paper detail

The NGC 346 massive star census: Nitrogen abundances for apparently single, narrow lined, hydrogen core burning B-type stars

Analyses of large spectroscopic surveys of early-type stars in the LMC have found an excess of nitrogen enriched B-type targets with a vsini<40 km/s compared with the predictions of single star evolutionary models incorporating rotational mixing. By contrast the number of such targets with 40<vsini<80 km/s were consistent with such models. We have undertaken a similar analysis for 61 B-type similar targets, towards the young cluster, NGC 346 in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). Approximately 65% could have nitrogen enhancements of less than 0.3 dex, consistent with them having experienced only small amounts of mixing due to their low rotational velocities. However as with the previous LMC surveys, an excess of stars with low projected rotational velocities, vsini<40 km/s and significant nitrogen enrichments is found. This is estimated to be approximately 5% of the total population of apparently single B-type stars or 40% of all stars with current rotational velocities of less than 40 km/s. For all three surveys, the presence of undetected binaries and other uncertainties imply that these percentages might be underestimated and indeed it is possible that all single stars with current rotational velocities of less than 40 km/s are nitrogen enriched. Possible explanations incorporate the effects of magnetic fields, via either a stellar merger followed by magnetic breaking or the evolution of a single star with a large magnetic field. Both mechanisms are compatible with the observed frequency of nitrogen-enriched stars in the Magellanic Clouds. Differences in the properties of the nitrogen-enriched stars compared with the remainder of the sample would be consistent with the former mechanism. For the latter, a qualitative comparison with evolutionary models incorporating magnetic fields is encouraging in terms of the amount of nitrogen enrichment and its presence in stars near the ZAMS.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.