Paper detail

The NEWFIRM Medium-Band Survey: Filter Definitions and First Results

Deep near-infrared imaging surveys allow us to select and study distant galaxies in the rest-frame optical, and have transformed our understanding of the early Universe. As the vast majority of K- or IRAC-selected galaxies is too faint for spectroscopy, the interpretation of these surveys relies almost exclusively on photometric redshifts determined from fitting templates to the broad-band photometry. The best-achieved accuracy of these redshifts Delta(z)/(1+z) ~ 0.06 at z>1.5, which is sufficient for determining the broad characteristics of the galaxy population but not for measuring accurate rest-frame colors, stellar population parameters, or the local galaxy density. We have started a near-infrared imaging survey with the NEWFIRM camera on the Kitt Peak 4m telescope to greatly improve the accuracy of photometric redshifts in the range 1.5<z<3.5. The survey uses five medium-bandwidth filters, which provide crude &#34;spectra&#34; over the wavelength range 1-1.8 micron for all objects in the 27.6 x 27.6 arcmin NEWFIRM field. In this first paper, we illustrate the technique by showing medium band NEWFIRM photometry of several galaxies at 1.7<z<2.7 from the near-infrared spectroscopic sample of Kriek et al. (2008). The filters unambiguously pinpoint the location of the redshifted Balmer break in these galaxies, enabling very accurate redshift measurements. The full survey will provide similar data for ~8000 faint K-selected galaxies at z>1.5 in the COSMOS and AEGIS fields. The filter set also enables efficient selection of exotic objects such as high redshift quasars, galaxies dominated by emission lines, and very cool brown dwarfs; we show that late T and candidate &#34;Y&#34; dwarfs could be identified using only two of the filters.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.