Abstract

We evaluate the masses and decay constants of the 0+0^+ and 1−1^- open-charm (cˉdˉ)(us)(\bar{c}\bar{d})(us) tetraquarks and molecular states from QCD spectral sum rules (QSSR) by using QCD Laplace sum rule (LSR). This method takes into account the stability criteria where the factorized perturbative NLO corrections and the contributions of quark and gluon condensates up to dimension-6 in the OPE are included. We confront our results with the D−K+D^- K^+ invariant mass recently reported by LHCb from B+→D+(D−K+)B^+ \to D^+(D^- K^+) decays. We expect that the resonance near the D−K+D^- K^+ threshold can be originated from the 0+(D−K+)0^{+}(D^-K^+) molecule and/or D−K+D^- K^+ scattering. The X0(2900)X_0(2900) scalar state and the resonance XJ(3150)X_J(3150) (if J=0J = 0) can emerge from a minimal mixing model, with a tiny mixing angle θ0≃(5.2±1.9)0θ_0 \simeq (5.2 \pm 1.9)^0, between a scalar Tetramole (T ⁣ ⁣M0)({\cal T}_{\!\!{\cal M}0}) (superposition of nearly degenerated hypothetical molecules and compact tetraquarks states with the same quantum numbers), having a mass MT ⁣ ⁣M0=2743(18)M_{{\cal T}_{\!\!{\cal M}0}} = 2743(18) MeV, and the first radial excitation of the D−K+D^- K^+ molecule with mass M(DK)1=3678(310)M_{(DK)_1} = 3678(310) MeV. In an analogous way, the X1(2900)X_1(2900) and the XJ(3350)X_J(3350) (if J=1J = 1) could be a mixture between the vector Tetramole (T ⁣ ⁣M1)({\cal T}_{\!\!{\cal M}1}), with a mass MT ⁣ ⁣M1=2656(20)M_{{\cal T}_{\!\!{\cal M}1}} = 2656(20) MeV, and its first radial excitation having a mass MT ⁣ ⁣M1=4592(141)M_{{\cal T}_{\!\!{\cal M}1}} = 4592(141) MeV with an angle θ0≃(9.1±0.6)0θ_0 \simeq (9.1 \pm 0.6)^0. A (non)-confirmation of these statements requires experimental findings of the quantum numbers of the resonances at 31503150 and 33503350 MeV.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.