Paper detail

The network footprint of replication in popular DBMSs

Database replication is an important component of reliable, disaster tolerant and highly available distributed systems. However, data replication also causes communication and processing overhead. Quantification of these overheads is crucial in choosing a suitable DBMS form several available options and capacity planning. In this paper, we present results from a comparative empirical analysis of replication activities of three commonly used DBMSs - MySQL, PostgreSQL and Cassandra under text as well as image traffic. In our experiments, the total traffic with two replicas (which is the norm) was as much as $300$\% higher than the total traffic with no replica. Furthermore, activation of the compression option for replication traffic, built into MySQL, reduced the total network traffic by as much as $20$\%. We also found that average CPU utilization and memory utilization were not impacted by the number of replicas or the dataset.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.