Paper detail

The nature of the young and low-mass open clusters Pismis5, vdB80, NGC1931 and BDSB96

We investigate the nature of 4 young and low-mass open clusters (OCs) located in the $2^{nd}$ and $3^{rd}$ quadrants with near-IR 2MASS photometry (errors $<0.1$ mag). After field decontamination, the colour-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) display similar morphologies: a poorly-populated main sequence (MS) and a dominant fraction of pre-MS (PMS) stars somewhat affected by differential reddening. Pismis 5, vdB 80 and BDSB 96 have MS ages within $5\pm4$ Myr, while the MS of NGC 1931 is $10\pm3$ Myr old. However, non-instantaneous star formation is implied by the wider ($\sim20$ Myr) PMS age spread. The cluster masses derived from MS + PMS stars are low, within $\sim60-180 \ms$, with mass functions (MFs) significantly flatter than Salpeter's initial mass function (IMF). Distances from the Sun are within $1.0-2.4$ kpc, and the visual absorptions are in the range $\aV=1.0-2.0$. From the stellar radial density profiles (RDPs), we find that they are small ($\rc\la0.48$ pc, $\rl\la5.8$ pc), especially Pismis 5 with $\rc\approx0.2$ pc and $\rl\approx1.8$ pc. Except for the irregular and cuspy inner regions of NGC 1931 and Pismis 5, the stellar RDPs follow a King-like profile. At $\sim10$ Myr, central cusps - which in old clusters appear to be related to advanced dynamical evolution - are probably associated with a star-formation and/or molecular cloud fragmentation effect. Despite the flat MFs, vdB 80 and BDSB 96 appear to be typical young, low-mass OCs. NGC 1931 and especially Pismis 5, with irregular RDPs, low cluster mass and flat MFs, do not appear to be in dynamical equilibrium. Both may be evolving into OB associations and/or doomed to dissolution in a few $10^7$ yr.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.