Paper detail

The nature of the X-ray transient MAXI J0556-332

Phase-resolved spectroscopy of the newly discovered X-ray transient MAXI J0556-332 has revealed the presence of narrow emission lines in the Bowen region that most likely arise on the surface of the mass donor star in this low mass X-ray binary. A period search of the radial velocities of these lines provides two candidate orbital periods (16.43+/-0.12 and 9.754+/-0.048 hrs), which differ from any potential X-ray periods reported. Assuming that MAXI J0556-332 is a relatively high inclination system that harbors a precessing accretion disk in order to explain its X-ray properties, it is only possible to obtain a consistent set of system parameters for the longer period. These assumptions imply a mass ratio of q~0.45, a radial velocity semi-amplitude of the secondary of K_2~190 km/s and a compact object mass of the order of the canonical neutron star mass, making a black hole nature for MAXI J0556-332 unlikely. We also report the presence of strong N III emission lines in the spectrum, thereby inferring a high N/O abundance. Finally we note that the strength of all emission lines shows a continuing decay over the ~1 month of our observations.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.