Paper detail

The Nature of the Strong 24 micron Spitzer Source J222557+601148: Not a Young Galactic Supernova Remnant

The nebula J222557+601148, tentatively identified by Morris et al. (2006) as a young Galactic supernova remnant (SNR) from Spitzer Galactic First Look Survey images and a follow-up mid-infrared spectrum, is unlikely to be a SNR remnant based on Halpha, [O III], [S II] images and low dispersion optical spectra. The object is seen in Halpha and [O III] 5007 images as a faint, roughly circular ring nebula with dimensions matching that seen in 24 micron Spitzer images. Low-dispersion optical spectra show it to have narrow Halpha and [N II] 6548, 6583 line emissions with no evidence of broad or high-velocity (v > 300 km/s) line emissions. The absence of any high-velocity optical features, the presence of relatively strong [N II] emissions, a lack of detected [S II] emission which would indicate the presence of shock-heated gas, plus no coincident X-ray or nonthermal radio emissions indicate the nebula is unlikely to be a SNR, young or old. Instead, it is likely a faint, high-excitation planetary nebula (PN) as its elliptical morphology would suggest, lying at a distance of approximately 2 - 3 kpc with unusual but not extraordinary mid-IR colors and spectrum. We have identified a m_r' = 22.4 +/- 0.2 star as a PN central star candidate.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.