Paper detail

The Nature of the Si II 6150A, Ca II HK, Ca II IR-triplet, and other Spectral Features in Supernova Type Ia Spectra

Spectra of Type Ia Supernovae (SN Ia) show both continuum-like and absorption-like line features. The pseudo equivalent width (pEW) and Doppler shift of absorption-line-like features, such as Si II 6150A, Ca II HK 3750A, and the Ca II IR-triplet 8150A quantities that are often associated with the optical depth and the velocity of a shell of interacting material, are important tools for interpreting and classifying the SN Ia spectra. In this paper, we examine the nature of spectral features in SN Ia spectra using W7 model spectra and a technique that we call "knock-out" spectra. We show that the P-Cyg profiles of Si II 6150A and many other features are largely emission dominated, rather than absorption dominated, and that the concepts of "absorption line" and "continuum" are therefore not adequate to describe the nature of spectral features in SNe Ia. Apparent absorption features, like Si II 6150A, are frequently just coincidental troughs between two (or more) uncorrelated emission features. In this situation, the pEW measured between these emission peaks is little related to the true strength of the presumed absorption feature. Furthermore, using the same knock-out technique, we demonstrate how spectral features overlap each other at different times after the explosion. This overlap distorts individual line profiles and affects measured absorption-line velocities. With synthetic SN Ia ejecta stratifications that are tuned to match specific observations, the method presented in this paper can in principle be used to quantify the effects of specific line opacities on measured line velocity, line strength, and line blending, and improve the interpretation and informative value of observed SN Ia spectra.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.