Paper detail

The nature of the companion in the Wolf-Rayet system EZ Canis Majoris

EZ Canis Majoris is a classical Wolf-Rayet star whose binary nature has been debated for decades. It was recently modeled as an eccentric binary with a periodic brightening at periastron of the emission originating in a shock heated zone near the companion. The focus of this paper is to further test the binary model and to constrain the nature of the unseen close companion by searching for emission arising in the shock-heated region. We analyze over 400 high resolution the International Ultraviolet Explorer spectra obtained between 1983 and 1995 and XMM-Newton observations obtained in 2010. The light curve and radial velocity (RV) variations were fit with the eccentric binary model and the orbital elements were constrained. We find RV variations in the primary emission lines with a semi-amplitude K$_1\sim$30 km/s in 1992 and 1995, and a second set of emissions with an anti-phase RV curve with K$_2\sim$150 km/s. The simultaneous model fit to the RVs and the light curve yields the orbital elements for each epoch. Adopting a Wolf-Rayet mass M$_1\sim$20 M$_\odot$ leads to M$_2\sim$3-5 M$_\odot$, which implies that the companion could be a late B-type star. The eccentric (e=0.1) binary model also explains the hard X-ray light curve obtained by XMM-Newton and the fit to these data indicates that the duration of maximum is shorter than the typical exposure times. The anti-phase RV variations of two emission components and the simultaneous fit to the RVs and the light curve are concrete evidence in favor of the binary nature of EZ Canis Majoris. The assumption that the emission from the shock-heated region closely traces the orbit of the companion is less certain, although it is feasible because the companion is significantly heated by the WR radiation field and impacted by the WR wind.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.