Paper detail

The Nature of $γ$-ray Variability in Blazars

We present an in-depth and systematic variability study of a sample of 20 powerful blazars, including 12 BL Lacs and 8 flat spectrum radio quasars, applying various analysis tools such as flux distribution, symmetry analysis, and time series analysis on the decade-long Fermi/LAT observations. The results show that blazars with steeper \gama-ray spectral indexes are found to be more variable; and the \gama-ray flux distribution closely resembles lognormal probability distribution function. The statistical variability properties of the sources as studied by power spectral density analysis are consistent with \emph{flicker noise} ($P(ν)\propto1/ν$) -- an indication of long-memory processes at work. Statistical analysis of the distribution of flux rise and decay rates in the light curves of the sources, aimed at distinguishing between particle acceleration and energy dissipation timescales, counter-intuitively suggests that both kinds of rates follow a similar distribution and the derived mean variability timescales are in the order of a few weeks. The corresponding emission region size is used to constrain location of \gama-ray production sites in the sources to be a few parsecs. Additionally, using Lomb-Scargle periodogram and weighted wavelet z-transform methods and extensive Monte Carlo simulations, we detected year timescale quasi-periodic oscillations in the sources S5 0716+714, Mrk 421, ON +325, PKS 1424-418 and PKS 2155-304. The detection significance was computed taking proper account of the red-noise and other artifacts inherent in the observations. We explain the results in the light of current blazar models with relativistic shocks propagating down the jet viewed close to the line of sight.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.