Paper detail

The Nature of H$β+$[O{\sc iii}] and [O{\sc ii}] emitters to $z \sim 5$ with HiZELS: stellar mass functions and the evolution of EWs

We investigate the properties of $\sim7000$ narrow-band selected galaxies with strong H$β+$[OIII] and [OII] nebular emission lines from the High-$z$ Emission Line Survey (HiZELS) between $z \sim 0.8 - 5.0$. Our sample covers a wide range in stellar mass ($M\sim10^{7.5 - 12.0}$ M$_\odot$), rest-frame equivalent widths (EW$_\mathrm{rest}\sim 10 - 10^5$ Å), and line luminosities ($L\sim10^{40.5 - 43.2}$ erg s$^{-1}$). We measure the H$β+$[OIII] and [OII]-selected stellar mass functions out to $z \sim 3.5$ and find that both $M_\star$ and $ϕ_\star$ increases with cosmic time, which may be due to the [OIII] selection including an increasing fraction of AGN at lower redshifts. The [OII]-selected stellar mass functions show a constant $M_\star\sim10^{11.6}$ M$_\odot$ and a strong, increasing evolution with cosmic time in $ϕ_\star$ in line with H$α$ studies. We also investigate the EW$_\mathrm{rest}$ evolution as a function of redshift with a fixed mass range (10$^{9.5 - 10.0}$ M$_\odot$) and find an increasing trend best represented by $(1+z)^{3.81\pm0.14}$ and $(1+z)^{2.72\pm0.19}$ up to $z\sim 2$ and $\sim 3$ for H$β$+[OIII] and [OII] emitters, respectively. This is the first time that the EW evolution has been directly measured for H$β+$[OIII] and [OII] emitters up to these redshifts. There is evidence for a slower evolution for $z > 2$ in the H$β+$[OIII] EW and a decreasing trend for $z > 3$ in the [OII] EW evolution, which would imply low [OII] EW at the highest redshifts and higher [OIII]/[OII] line ratios. This suggests that the ionization parameter at higher redshift may be significantly higher than the local Universe. Our results set the stage for future near-IR space-based spectroscopic surveys to test our extrapolated predictions and also produce $z > 5$ measurements to constrain the high-$z$ end of the EW$_\mathrm{rest}$ and [OIII]/[OII] evolution.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.