Paper detail

The nature of dust in compact Galactic planetary nebulae from Spitzer spectra

We present the Spitzer/IRS spectra of 157 compact Galactic PNe. These young PNe provide insight on the effects of dust in early post-AGB evolution, before much of the dust is altered or destroyed by the hardening stellar radiation field. Most of the selected targets have PN-type IRS spectra, while a few turned out to be misclassified stars. We inspected the group properties of the PN spectra and classified them based on the different dust classes (featureless, carbon-rich dust; oxygen-rich dust; mixed-chemistry dust) and subclasses (aromatic and aliphatic; crystalline and amorphous). All PNe are characterized by dust continuum and more than 80% of the sample shows solid state features above the continuum, in contrast with the Magellanic Cloud sample where only ~40% of the entire sample displays solid state features; this is an indication of the strong link between dust properties and metallicity. The Galactic PNe that show solid state features are almost equally divided among the CRD, ORD, and MCD. We analyzed dust properties together with other PN properties and found that (i) there is an enhancement of MCD PNe toward the Galactic center; (ii) CRD PNe could be seen as defining an evolutionary sequence, contrary to the ORD and MCD PNe; (iii) C- and O-rich grains retain different equilibrium temperatures, as expected from models; (iv) ORD PNe are highly asymmetric and CRD PNe highly symmetric; point-symmetry is statistically more common in MCD. We find that the Galactic Disk sample does not include MCD PNe, and the other dust classes are differently populated from high to low metallicity environments. The MCPNe seem to attain higher dust temperatures at similar evolutionary stages, in agreement with the observational findings of smaller dust grains in low metallicity interstellar environments.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.