Paper detail

The nature of assembly bias - I. Clues from a LCDM cosmology

We present a new proxy for the overdensity peak height for which the large-scale clustering of haloes of a given mass does not vary significantly with the assembly history. The peak height, usually taken to be well represented by the virial mass, can instead be approximated by the mass inside spheres of different radii, which in some cases can be larger than the virial radius and therefore include mass outside the individual host halo. The sphere radii are defined as r = $a$ delta_t + $b$ log_10(M_vir/M_nl), where delta_t is the age relative to the typical age of galaxies hosted by haloes with virial mass M_vir, M_nl is the non-linear mass, and $a$=0.2 and $b$=-0.02 are the free parameters adjusted to trace the assembly bias effect. Note that $r$ depends on both halo mass and age. In this new approach, some of the objects which were initially considered low-mass peaks belong to regions with higher overdensities. At large scales, i.e. in the two-halo regime, this model properly recovers the simple prescription where the bias responds to the height of the mass peak alone, in contrast to the usual definition (virial mass) that shows a strong dependence on additional halo properties such as formation time. The dependence on the age in the one-halo term is also remarkably reduced. The population of galaxies whose "peak height" changes with this new definition consists mainly of old stellar populations and are preferentially hosted by low-mass haloes located near more massive objects. The latter is in agreement with recent results which indicate that old, low-mass haloes would suffer truncation of mass accretion by nearby larger haloes or simply due to the high density of their surroundings, thus showing an assembly bias effect. The change in mass is small enough that the Sheth et al. (2001) mass function is still a good fit to the resulting distribution of new masses.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.