Paper detail

The nanofluidics can explain ascent of water in tallest trees

In Amazing numbers in biology, Flindt reports a giant, 128 meter-tall eucalyptus, and a 135 meter-tall sequoia. However, the explanation of the maximum altitude of the crude sap ascent and consequently the main reason of the maximum size that trees can reach is not well understood. According to tree species, the crude sap is driven in xylem microtubes with diameters ranging between 50 and 400 micrometers. The sap contains diluted salts but its physical properties are roughly those of water; consequently, hydrodynamic, capillarity and osmotic pressure yield a crude sap ascent of a few tens of meters only. Today, we can propound a new understanding of the ascent of sap to the top of very tall trees thanks to a new comparison between experiments associated with the cohesion-tension theory and the disjoining pressure concept. Here we show that the pressure in the water-storing tracheids of leaves can be strongly negative whereas the pressure in the xylem microtubes of stems may remain positive when, at high level, inhomogeneous liquid nanolayers wet the xylem walls of microtubes. The nanofluidic model of crude sap in tall trees discloses a stable sap layer up to an altitude where the pancake layer thickness coexists with the dry xylem wall and corresponds to the maximum size of tallest trees. In very thin layers, sap flows are widely more significant than those obtained with classical Navier-Stokes models and consequently are able to refill stomatic cells when phloem embolisms supervene. These results drop an inkling that the disjoining pressure is an efficient tool to study biological liquids in contact with substrates at a nanoscale range.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.