Paper detail

The Na-O anticorrelation in horizontal branch stars. II. NGC1851

We studied the Na-O anti-correlation from moderately high resolution spectra for 35 stars on the blue HB (BHB), one RR Lyrae, and 55 stars are on the red HB (RHB) of NGC1851. We also derived abundances for He and N in BHB stars, and Ba and upper limits for N in RHB stars. The RHB stars clearly separate into two groups: the vast majority are O-rich and Na-poor, while about 10-15% are Na-rich and moderately O-poor. Most Na-rich RHB stars are also Ba-rich and there is an overall correlation between Na and Ba abundances within the RHB. The group of Ba-rich RHB stars resides on the warmer edge and includes ~10% of the RHB stars. We propose that they are the descendant of the stars on the RGB sequence with very red v-y colour. This sequence is known also to consist of Ba and perhaps CNO-rich stars. However, the upper limit we obtain for N ([N/Fe]<1.55) for one of the Ba-rich stars coupled with the low C-abundances for RGB Ba-rich stars from the literature suggests that the total CNO might not be particularly high ([(C+N+O)/Fe]<=0.15). The other Na-rich RHB stars are also at the warm edge of the RHB and the only RR Lyrae is Na-rich and moderately O-poor. We also find a Na-O anticorrelation among BHB stars, partially overlapping that found among RHB stars, though generally BHB stars are more Na-rich and O-poor. However, there is no clear correlation between temperature and Na and O abundances within the BHB. The average He abundance in BHB stars is Y=0.29+/-0.05. N abundances are quite uniform at [N/Fe]=1.16+/-0.14 among BHB stars, with a small trend with temperature. This value is consistent with normal CNO abundance and excludes that BHB stars are very CNO-rich: this leaves an age spread of ~1.5 Gyr as the only viable explanation for the split of the SGB. [Abridged]

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.