Paper detail

The N$_2$ Production Rate in Comet C/2016 R2 (PanSTARRS)

Observations of comet C/2016 R2 (PanSTARRS) have revealed exceptionally bright emission bands of N$_2^+$, the strongest ever observed in a comet spectrum. Alternatively, it appears to be poor in CN compared to other comets, and remarkably depleted in H$_2$O. Here we quantify the N$_2$ production rate from N$_2^+$ emission lines using the Haser model. We derived effective parent and daughter scalelengths for N2 producing N2+. This is the first direct measurement of such parameters. Using a revised fluorescence efficiency for N2+, the resulting production rate of molecular nitrogen is inferred to be Q(N$_2$) ~ 1 $\times 10^{28}$ molecules.s-1 on average for 11, 12, and 13 Feb. 2018, the highest for any known comet. Based on a CO production rate of Q(CO) ~ 1.1 $\times 10^{29}$ molecules.s-1, we find Q(N$-2$)/Q(CO)~0.09, which is consistent with the N$_2^+$/CO$^+$ ratio derived from the observed intensities of N$_2^+$ and CO$^+$ emission lines. We also measure significant variations in this production rate between our three observing nights, with Q(N$_2$) varying by plus or minus 20% according to the average value

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.