Paper detail

The mutual energy current interpretation for quantum mechanics

Quantum physics has the probability interpretation. From the knowledge of light, we know that wave is always spread out, and hence the electron wave should also spread out. That means the electron wave beam should like the light wave beam become diverged from the source. When the electron is received by an atom we thought the wave collapse. The place to collapse is depends on the probability calculated from the square of absolute value of the wave function. The recent new discovery tell us that the light is not just wave, it is a combination of waves, retarded potential and advanced potential. These two potentials together produce the mutual energy current or referred as M-current. Another light energy current is P-current related to Poynting vector. We found P-current doesn't carry any energy for light. The contribution of P-current to energy transfer can be omitted. The light energy is transferred only by M-current. The beam of M-current doesn't like the beam of P-current which is diverged from the source, instead, the M-current beam first diverges from a source and then converged to a sink. Since the M-current at the place to be received is localized at one electron, the concept of wave function collapse is needless. The probability results of light is because that we have use P-current to roughly calculate the M-current. We thought if Schrödinger knew today's light theory, he would for sure also build his wave theory for quantum mechanics similar to the new light theory with M-current. Hence we claim that the M-current theory is not only suitable to the light but also can be applied to the quantum physics. This means all particles are M-current. The M-current is composed of not only the retarded wave, but also the advanced wave. M-current is an inner product of a retarded and an advanced waves.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.