Paper detail

The MUSE-Faint survey: I. Spectroscopic evidence for a star cluster in Eridanus 2 and constraints on MACHOs as a constituent of dark matter

We aim to provide spectroscopic evidence regarding the nature of the putative star cluster in Eridanus 2 and to place constraints on the mass and abundance of massive astrophysical compact halo objects (MACHOs) as a constituent of dark matter. Methods. We present spectroscopic observations of the central square arcminute of Eridanus 2 from MUSE-Faint, a survey of ultra-faint dwarf galaxies with the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer on the Very Large Telescope. We derive line-of-sight velocities for possible member stars of the putative cluster and for stars in the centre of Eridanus 2. We discuss the existence of the cluster and determine new constraints for MACHOs using the Fokker-Planck diffusion approximation. Results. Out of 182 extracted spectra, we identify 26 member stars of Eridanus 2, seven of which are possible cluster members. We find intrinsic mean line-of-sight velocities of $79.7^{+3.1}_{-3.8}\,\mathrm{km}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ and $76.0^{+3.2}_{-3.7}\,\mathrm{km}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ for the cluster and the bulk of Eridanus 2, respectively, and intrinsic velocity dispersions of ${<}7.6\,\mathrm{km}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ (68-$\%$ upper limit) and $10.3^{+3.9}_{-3.2}\,\mathrm{km}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$, respectively. This indicates the cluster most likely exists as a distinct dynamical population hosted by Eridanus 2, without surplus of dark matter over the background distribution. Among the member stars in the bulk of Eridanus 2, we find possible carbon stars, alluding to the existence of an intermediate-age population. We derive constraints on the fraction of dark matter that can consist of MACHOs with a given mass between $1$-$10^5\,M_\mathrm{sun}$. For dark matter consisting purely of MACHOs, the mass of the MACHOs must be less than ${\sim}7.6\,M_\mathrm{sun}$ and ${\sim}44\,M_\mathrm{sun}$ at a $68$- and $95$-$\%$ confidence level, respectively. (Abridged)

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.