Paper detail

The muon g-2 anomaly confronts new physics in $e^\pm$ and $μ^\pm$ final states scattering

The 4.2$σ$ discrepancy between the standard model prediction for the muon anomalous magnetic moment $a_μ$ and the experimental result is accompanied by other anomalies. A crucial input for the prediction is the hadronic vacuum polarization $a_μ^{\rm HVP}$ inferred from $σ_{\rm had} =σ(e^+e^- \to\,$hadrons) data. However, the two most accurate determinations of $σ_{\rm had}$ from KLOE and BaBar disagree by almost 3$\,σ$. Additionally, the combined data-driven result disagrees with the most precise lattice determination of $a_μ^{\rm HVP}$ by $2.1\,σ$. We show that all these discrepancies could be accounted for by a new boson produced resonantly around the KLOE centre of mass energy and decaying promptly yielding $e^+e^-$ and $μ^+μ^-$ pairs in the final states. This gives rise to three different effects: (i) the additional $e^+e^-$ events will affect the KLOE luminosity determination based on measurements of the Bhabha cross section, and in turn the inferred value of $σ_{\rm had}$; (ii) the additional $μ^+μ^-$ events will affect the determination of $σ_{\rm had}$ via the (luminosity independent) measurement of the ratio of $π^+π^-γ$ versus $μ^+μ^-γ$ events; (iii) loops involving the new boson would contribute directly to the prediction for $a_μ$. We discuss in detail this possibility, and we present a simple model that can reconcile the KLOE and BaBar results for $σ_{\rm had}$, the data-driven and the lattice determinations of $a_μ^{\rm HVP}$, the predicted and measured values of $a_μ$, while complying with all phenomenological constraints.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.