The muon g-2 anomaly confronts new physics in e±e^\pm and μ±μ^\pm final states scattering

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

The 4.2σσ discrepancy between the standard model prediction for the muon anomalous magnetic moment aμa_μ and the experimental result is accompanied by other anomalies. A crucial input for the prediction is the hadronic vacuum polarization aμHVPa_μ^{\rm HVP} inferred from σhad=σ(e+e−→ σ_{\rm had} =σ(e^+e^- \to\,hadrons) data. However, the two most accurate determinations of σhadσ_{\rm had} from KLOE and BaBar disagree by almost 3 σ\,σ. Additionally, the combined data-driven result disagrees with the most precise lattice determination of aμHVPa_μ^{\rm HVP} by 2.1 σ2.1\,σ. We show that all these discrepancies could be accounted for by a new boson produced resonantly around the KLOE centre of mass energy and decaying promptly yielding e+e−e^+e^- and μ+μ−μ^+μ^- pairs in the final states. This gives rise to three different effects: (i) the additional e+e−e^+e^- events will affect the KLOE luminosity determination based on measurements of the Bhabha cross section, and in turn the inferred value of σhadσ_{\rm had}; (ii) the additional μ+μ−μ^+μ^- events will affect the determination of σhadσ_{\rm had} via the (luminosity independent) measurement of the ratio of π+π−γπ^+π^-γ versus μ+μ−γμ^+μ^-γ events; (iii) loops involving the new boson would contribute directly to the prediction for aμa_μ. We discuss in detail this possibility, and we present a simple model that can reconcile the KLOE and BaBar results for σhadσ_{\rm had}, the data-driven and the lattice determinations of aμHVPa_μ^{\rm HVP}, the predicted and measured values of aμa_μ, while complying with all phenomenological constraints.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.