Paper detail

The muon $g$-2 and $Δα$ connection

The discrepancy between the Standard Model theory and experimental measurement of the muon magnetic moment anomaly, $a_μ=\left(g_μ-2\right)/2$, is connected to precision electroweak (EW) predictions via their common dependence on hadronic vacuum polarization effects. The same data for the total $e^+e^- \rightarrow \text{hadrons}$ cross section, $σ_{\rm had}(s)$, are used as input into dispersion relations to estimate the hadronic vacuum polarization contributions, $a_μ^{\rm had,\,VP}$, as well as the five-flavor hadronic contribution to the running QED coupling at the $Z$-pole, $Δα_{\rm had}^{(5)}(M_{Z}^2)$, which enters natural relations and global EW fits. The EW fit prediction of $Δα_{\rm had}^{(5)}(M_{Z}^2) = 0.02722(41)$ agrees well with $Δα_{\rm had}^{(5)}(M_{Z}^2) = 0.02761(11)$ obtained from the dispersion relation approach, but exhibits a smaller central value suggestive of a larger discrepancy $Δa_μ=a_μ^{\rm exp} - a_μ^{\rm SM}$ than currently expected. Postulating that the $Δa_μ$ difference may be due to missing $σ_{\rm had}(s)$ contributions, implications for $M_W$, $\sin^2 \! θ^{\rm lep}_{\rm eff}$ and $M_H$ obtained from global EW fits are investigated. Shifts in $σ_{\rm had}(s)$ needed to bridge $Δa_μ$ are found to be excluded above $\sqrt{s} \gtrsim 0.7$ GeV at the 95\%CL. Moreover, prospects for $Δa_μ$ originating below that energy are deemed improbable given the required increases in the cross section. Such hypothetical changes to the hadronic data are also found to affect other related observables, such as the electron anomaly, $a_e^{\rm SM}$, the ratio $R_{e/μ} = (m_μ/m_e)^2 (a_{e}^{\rm had,\,LO\,VP}/a_μ^{\rm had,\,LO\,VP})$ and the running of the weak mixing angle at low energies, although the consequences of these are currently less constraining.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.