Paper detail

The Multiplicative Chaos of $H=0$ Fractional Brownian Fields

We consider a family of fractional Brownian fields $\{B^{H}\}_{H\in (0,1)}$ on $\mathbb{R}^{d}$, where $H$ denotes their Hurst parameter. We first define a rich class of normalizing kernels $ψ$ such that the covariance of $$ X^{H}(x) = Γ(H)^{\frac{1}{2}} \left( B^{H}(x) - \int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} B^{H}(u) ψ(u, x)du\right), $$ converges to the covariance of a log-correlated Gaussian field when $H \downarrow 0$. We then use Berestycki's ``good points'' approach in order to derive the limiting measure of the so-called multiplicative chaos of the fractional Brownian field $$ M^{H}_γ(dx) = e^{γX^{H}(x) - \frac{γ^{2}}{2} E[X^{H}(x)^{2}] }dx, $$ as $H\downarrow 0$ for all $γ\in (0,γ^{*}(d)]$, where $γ^{*}(d)>\sqrt{\frac{7}{4}d}$. As a corollary we establish the $L^{2}$ convergence of $M^{H}_γ$ over the sets of ``good points'', where the field $X^H$ has a typical behaviour. As a by-product of the convergence result, we prove that for log-normal rough volatility models with small Hurst parameter, the volatility process is supported on the sets of ``good points'' with probability close to $1$. Moreover, on these sets the volatility converges in $L^2$ to the volatility of multifractal random walks.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.