Paper detail

The multi-level friendship paradox for sparse random graphs

In Hazra, den Hollander and Parvaneh (2025) we analysed the friendship paradox for sparse random graphs. For four classes of random graphs we characterised the empirical distribution of the friendship biases between vertices and their neighbours at distance $1$, proving convergence as $n\to\infty$ to a limiting distribution, with $n$ the number of vertices, and identifying moments and tail exponents of the limiting distribution. In the present paper we look at the multi-level friendship bias between vertices and their neighbours at distance $k \in \mathbb{N}$ obtained via a $k$-step exploration according to a backtracking or a non-backtracking random walk. We identify the limit of empirical distribution of the multi-level friendship biases as $n\to\infty$ and/or $k\to\infty$. We show that for non-backtracking exploration the two limits commute for a large class of sparse random graphs, including those that locally converge to a rooted Galton-Watson tree. In particular, we show that the same limit arises when $k$ depends on $n$, i.e., $k=k_n$, provided $\lim_{n\to\infty} k_n = \infty$ under some mild conditions. We exhibit cases where the two limits do not commute and show the relevance of the mixing time of the exploration.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.