Paper detail

The multi-frequency angular power spectrum in parameter studies of the cosmic 21-cm signal

The light-cone effect breaks the periodicity and statistical homogeneity (ergodicity) along the line-of-sight direction of cosmological emission/absorption line surveys. The spherically averaged power spectrum (SAPS), which by definition assumes ergodicity and periodicity in all directions, can only quantify some of the second-order statistical information in the 3D light-cone signals and therefore gives a biased estimate of the true statistics. The multi-frequency angular power spectrum (MAPS), by extracting more information from the data, does not rely on these assumptions. It is therefore better aligned with the properties of the signal. We have compared the performance of the MAPS and SAPS metrics for parameter estimation for a mock 3D light-cone observation of the 21-cm signal from the Epoch of Reionization. Our investigation is based on a simplified 3-parameter 21cmFAST model. We find that the MAPS produces parameter constraints which are a factor of $\sim 2$ more stringent than when the SAPS is used. The significance of this result does not change much even in the presence of instrumental noise expected for 128 hours of SKA-Low observations. Our results therefore suggest that a parameter estimation framework based on the MAPS metric would yield superior results over one using the SAPS metric.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.