Paper detail

The Most Predictive Physical Properties for the Stellar Population Radial Profiles of Nearby Galaxies

We present a study on the radial profiles of D4000,luminosity-weighted stellar ages $τ_L$,and luminosity-weighted stellar metallicities $[Z/H]_L$ of 3654 nearby galaxies($0.01<z<0.15$)using the IFU spectroscopic data from the MaNGA survey available in the SDSS DR15,in an effort to explore the connection between median stellar population radial gradients($\nabla$D4000,$\nablaτ_L,\nabla[Z/H]_L$)out to~$1.5R_e$ and various galaxy properties,including stellar mass($M_\star$),specific star formation rate(sSFR),morphologies,and local environment. We find that $M_\star$ is the single most predictive physical property for$\nabla$D4000 and$\nabla[Z/H]_L$. The most predictive properties for $\nablaτ_L$ are sSFR,and to a lesser degree,$M_\star$. The environmental parameters,including local galaxy overdensities and central-satellite division,have virtually no correlation with stellar population radial profiles for the whole sample,but the $\nabla$D4000 of star-forming satellite galaxies with$M_\star\lesssim 10^{10}M_\odot$exhibit a significant positive correlation with galaxy overdensities. Galaxies with lower sSFR have on average steeper negative stellar population gradients,and this sSFR dependence is stronger for more massive star-forming galaxies. The negative correlation between the median stellar population gradients and$M_\star$ are best described largely as segmented relationships, whereby median gradients of galaxies with$\log M_\star\lesssim 10$(with the exact value depending on sSFR)have much weaker mass dependence than galaxies with higher$M_\star$. While the dependence of the radial gradients of ages and metallicities on T-Types and central stellar mass surface densities are generally not significant,galaxies with later T-Types or lower central mass densities tend to have significantly lower D4000,younger$τ_L$ and lower$[Z/H]_L$ across the radial ranges probed in this study.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.