Paper detail

The Most Metal-Poor Quadruple System of Subdwarfs G89-14

The system of subdwarfs G89-14 is one of the most metal-poor multiple stars with an atmospheric metal abundance $\mathrm{[m/H]}=-1.9$. Speckle interferometry at the 6-m BTA telescope has revealed that G89-14 consists of four components. Measurements of the magnitude difference between the components and published data have allowed their masses to be estimated: $M_{A}\approx0.67 M_{\odot}$, $M_{B}\approx0.24 M_{\odot}$, $M_{C}\approx0.33 M_{\odot}$, and $M_{D}\approx0.22 M_{\odot}$. The ratio of the orbital periods of the subsystems has been obtained, 0.52 yr : 3 000 yr : 650 000 yr (1:5769:1250000), indicative of a high degree of hierarchy of G89-14 and its internal dynamical stability. The calculated Galactic orbital elements and the low metallicity of the quadruple system suggest that it belongs to the Galactic halo.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.