Paper detail

The most massive galaxies with large depleted cores: structural parameter relations and black hole masses

[Abridged] Luminous spheroids (M_V < - 21.50 +- 0.75 mag) contain partially depleted cores with sizes (R_ b) typically 0.02 - 0.5 kpc. However, galaxies with R_b > 0.5 kpc are rare and poorly understood. Here we perform detailed decompositions of the composite surface brightness profiles, extracted from archival Hubble Space Telescope and ground-based images, of 12 extremely luminous &#34;large-core&#34; galaxies that have R_b > 0.5 kpc and M_V < -23.50 +- 0.10 mag, fitting a core-Sérsic model to the galaxy spheroids. Using 28 &#34;normal-core&#34; (i.e., R_b < 0.5 kpc) galaxies and 1 &#34;large-core&#34; (i.e., R_b > 0.5 kpc) galaxy from the literature, we constructed a final sample of 41 core-Sérsic galaxies. We find that large-core spheroids (with stellar masses M_* > 10^12 M_sun) are not simple high-mass extensions of the less luminous normal-core spheroids having M_* ~ 8 x 10^10 - 10^12 M_sun. While the two types follow the same strong relations between the spheroid luminosity L_V and R_b (R_b prop L_V^(1.38 +- 0.13), and the spheroid half-light radius R_e (R_e prop L_V^(1.08 +- 0.09), for ellipticals plus BCGs), we discover a break in the core-Sérsic sigma-L_V relation occurring at M_V ~ -23.50 +- 0.10 mag. Furthermore, we find a strong log-linear R_b-M_BH relation for the 11 galaxies in the sample with directly determined SMBH masses M_BH---3/11 galaxies are large-core galaxies ---such that R_b prop M_BH^(0.83 +- 0.10). However, for the large-core galaxies the SMBH masses estimated from the M_BH-sigma and core-Sérsic M_BH-L relations are undermassive, by up to a factor of 40, relative to expectations from their large R_b values, confirming earlier results. Our findings suggest that large-core galaxies harbour overmassive SMBHs (M_BH > 10^10 M_sun), considerably (~ 3.7-15.6 sigma and ~ 0.6-1.7 sigma) larger than expectations from the spheroid sigma and L, respectively.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.