Paper detail

The Most Massive Active Black-Holes at z~1.5-3.5 Have High Spins and Radiative Efficiencies

The radiative efficiencies ($η$) of 72 luminous unobscured Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) at $z\sim1.5-3.5$, powered by some of the most massive black holes (BHs), are constrained. The analysis is based on accretion disk (AD) models, which link the continuum luminosity at rest-frame optical wavelengths and the black hole mass ($M_{\rm BH}$) to the accretion rate through the AD, $\dot{M}_{\rm AD}$. The data are gathered from several literature samples with detailed measurements of the ${\rm H}β$ emission line complex, observed at near-IR bands. When coupled with standard estimates of bolometric luminosities ($L_{\rm bol}$), the analysis suggests high radiative efficiencies, with most of the sources showing $η>0.2$ - that is, higher than the commonly assumed value of 0.1, and the expected value for non-spinning BHs ($η=0.057$). Even under more conservative assumptions regarding $L_{\rm bol}$ (i.e., $L_{\rm bol}=3\times λL_λ$[5100$Å$]), most of the extremely massive BHs in the sample (i.e., $M_{\rm BH} > 3\times10^9\,M_{\rm \odot}$) show radiative efficiencies which correspond to very high BH spins ($a_{\rm *}$), with typical values well above $a_{\rm *}\simeq0.7$. These results stand in contrast to the predictions of a "spin-down"scenario, in which a series of randomly-oriented accretion episodes lead to $a_{\rm *}\simeq0$. Instead, the analysis presented here strongly supports a "spin-up" scenario, which is driven by either prolonged accretion or a series of anisotropically-oriented accretion episodes. Considering the fact that these extreme BHs require long-duration continuous accretion to account for their high masses, it is argued that the most probable scenario for the SMBHs under study is that of an almost continuous sequence of randomly- yet not isotropically-oriented accretion episodes.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.