Paper detail

The MOSDEF Survey: Implications of the Lack of Evolution in the Dust Attenuation-Mass Relation to z~2

We investigate the relationship between dust attenuation and stellar mass ($M_*$) in star-forming galaxies over cosmic time. For this analysis, we compare measurements from the MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field (MOSDEF) survey at $z\sim2.3$ and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) at $z\sim0$, augmenting the latter optical dataset with both UV Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) and mid-infrared Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) photometry from the GALEX-SDSS-WISE Catalog. We quantify dust attenuation using both spectroscopic measurements of H$α$ and H$β$ emission lines, and photometric measurements of the rest-UV stellar continuum. The H$α$/H$β$ ratio is used to determine the magnitude of attenuation at the wavelength of H$α$, $A_{{\rm H}α}$. Rest-UV colors and spectral-energy-distribution fitting are used to estimate $A_{1600}$, the magnitude of attenuation at a rest wavelength of 1600Å. As in previous work, we find a lack of significant evolution in the relation between dust attenuation and $M_*$ over the redshift range $z\sim0$ to $z\sim2.3$. Folding in the latest estimates of the evolution of $M_{\rm dust}$, $({M_{\rm dust}}/{M_{\rm gas}})$, and gas surface density at fixed $M_*$, we find that the expected $M_{\rm dust}$ and dust mass surface density are both significantly higher at $z\sim2.3$ than at $z\sim0$. These differences appear at odds with the lack of evolution in dust attenuation. To explain the striking constancy in attenuation vs. $M_*$, it is essential to determine the relationship between metallicity and $({M_{\rm dust}}/{M_{\rm gas}})$, the dust mass absorption coefficient, and dust geometry, and the evolution of these relations and quantities from $z\sim0$ to $z\sim2.3$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access13 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.