Paper detail

The MOSDEF Survey: Environmental dependence of the gas-phase metallicity of galaxies at $1.4 \leq z \leq 2.6$

Using the near-IR spectroscopy of the MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field (MOSDEF) survey, we investigate the role of local environment in the gas-phase metallicity of galaxies. The local environment measurements are derived from accurate and uniformly calculated photometric redshifts with well-calibrated probability distributions. Based on rest-frame optical emission lines, [NII]$\lambda6584$ and H$α$, we measure gas-phase oxygen abundance of 167 galaxies at $1.37\leq z\leq1.7$ and 303 galaxies at $2.09\leq z\leq2.61$, located in diverse environments. We find that at $z\sim1.5$, the average metallicity of galaxies in overdensities with $M_*\sim10^{9.8}M_\odot, 10^{10.2}M_\odot$ and $10^{10.8}M_\odot$ is higher relative to their field counterparts by $0.094\pm0.051$, $0.068\pm0.028$ and $0.052\pm0.043$ dex, respectively. However, this metallicity enhancement does not exist at higher redshift, $z\sim2.3$, where, compared to the field galaxies, we find $0.056\pm0.043$, $0.056\pm0.028$ and $0.096\pm 0.034$ dex lower metallicity for galaxies in overdense environments with $M_*\sim10^{9.8}M_\odot, 10^{10.2}M_\odot$ and $10^{10.7}M_\odot$, respectively. Our results suggest that, at $1.37\leq z\leq2.61$, the variation of mass-metallicity relation with local environment is small ($<0.1$dex), and reverses at $z\sim2$. Our results support the hypothesis that, at the early stages of cluster formation, owing to efficient gas cooling, galaxies residing in overdensities host a higher fraction of pristine gas with prominent primordial gas accretion, which lowers their gas-phase metallicity compared to their coeval field galaxies. However, as the Universe evolves to lower redshifts ($z\lesssim2$), shock-heated gas in overdensities cannot cool down efficiently, and galaxies become metal-rich rapidly due to the suppression of pristine gas inflow and re-accretion of metal-enriched outflows in overdensities.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access16 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.